Someone has updated the Dr Hawass website with the following explanation of the court case
http://www.drhawass.com/blog/explanation-court-trial-against-me
The 2 newspaper articles state it was a land dispute that had been ruled on, and Hawass had not acted upon the court ruling. Does anyone think a contract for renting the bookshop in the Egyptian Museum would be classed as a land dispute, particularly when it has been stated that the disputed land was claimed to be designated Antiquities land?
It will be interesting to see how this one pans out. Watch this space!
http://www.drhawass.com/blog/explanation-court-trial-against-me
The 2 newspaper articles state it was a land dispute that had been ruled on, and Hawass had not acted upon the court ruling. Does anyone think a contract for renting the bookshop in the Egyptian Museum would be classed as a land dispute, particularly when it has been stated that the disputed land was claimed to be designated Antiquities land?
It will be interesting to see how this one pans out. Watch this space!
No comments:
Post a Comment